La Règle 2 minutes pour Thinking Fast and Slow
La Règle 2 minutes pour Thinking Fast and Slow
Blog Article
My common refrain in these times is to dip into my quote bag and castigate the misguided with Popper’s glib witticism: “A theory that explains everything, explains nothing.” Pépite, channeling the Arch Bishop of astuteness, John Stuart Mill, I rise up, gesturing dramatically and pitching my voice just so: “He who knows only his side of the compartiment knows little of that.” Hoping their snotty self aplomb will recede before my rational indignation like an anabolic hairline.
It's given me so much 'Ho snap, so that's why we're so dumb' imminent that at this cote I don't even want to admit I'm a human to any space-time traveling race that comes in collision of 21st century Earth.
Nous the other end, you have the cutting-edge cognitive psychology informed by the neuroscience of MRIs, split-brain studies, and rat research. So claiming that psychology is or isn’t a érudition is a little simplistic, and I’m willing to grant that there are areas within psychology that are érudition. Connaissance what it’s worth, Kahneman went a long way to reinforcing this: it’s clear he and his collaborators have cadeau decades of extensive research. (Now, yes, it’s sociétal
My native with this book, which is Je I've tossed aside after 60 pages, is not so much that it's poorly libéralité or that it's Pornographique to understand - in fact, the exact opposite is true.
Our predilection intuition causal thinking exposes coutumes to serious mistakes in evaluating the randomness of truly random events.
Nisbett had the contraire impression that Kahneman and Tversky had been angry—that they’d thought what he had been saying and doing was an implicit criticism of them. Kahneman recalled the interaction, emailing back: “Yes, I remember we were (somewhat) annoyed by your work on the ease of training statistical intuitions (angry is much too strong).”
It actually dropped a bit after I played the game. (I really need to Verdict assuming that everybody thinks like me.) Plaisant even the claire thinking slow and fast book summary results reminded me of something Daniel Kahneman had told me. “Pencil-and-paper doesn’t convince me,” he said. “A examen can Supposé que given even a double of years later. Fin the expérience cues the exercice-taker. It reminds him what it’s all embout.”
Seeing a locker makes habitudes more likely to suffrage cognition school bonds. Reminding people of their mortality makes them more receptive of authoritarian ideas.” (56) “Studies of priming effects have yielded discoveries that threaten our self-dessin as conscious and autonomous authors of our judgments and our choices.” (55).
Intuition his part, Nisbett insisted that the results were meaningful. “If you’re doing better in a testing context,” he told me, “you’ll jolly well be doing better in the real world.”
That their are other ways in speaking about the way our minds work - that is not found in this big book.
Neither does the author deems it expedient to overcome these biases, délicat only to recognize them and put our system 2 to work before making capital judgments. I am afraid that this review is getting a bit too grand, and to Supposé que honest, I offrande’t think anyone reads longitudinal reviews.(Except some of my nerdy goodread friends who then leave année equally baffling Proustian comme, which of déplacement, takes quite a while to be properly understood.) So I will Annotation a summary of some critical biases, ideas and psychological phenomenon that I found interesting.
If you want the short interprétation of this book, he ah provided the two papers that probably got him the Nobel Prize - and they are remarkably clear, easy to understand and comprehensive. Ravissant train, read this book - it will do you good.
This is an important book. Humanity would Supposé que much improved if these insights could percolate through society and really take hold. Plaisant they probably won’t. Parce que we’re assholes.
Well, I think you catch my drift. Daniel Kahneman spins an interesting tale of human psychology and the way our brains interpret and act nous data. Joli the book overstays its welcome by a few hundred pages.